Photograph

Ev'ry time I see your face, It reminds me of the places we used to go

ok so I see that once again in Judge Brian Hill's circus-like courtroom, more mischief is happening...DUI enabler/cheerleader atty Darryl Genis is being accused of ..guess what..contempt of court! well duh..I never seen no one so contemptable as Darryl and his contempt for his court job is a cry for help...see, he really wants ot be a professional surfer like Saun Tomson or some other gitbag...I saw the story in the News-Press and I was aghast that it wasn't written by Darryl's girlfriend Scott Steepleton...so where's Scott?

so I guess Darryl was caught on tape jerking off on an opposing lawyer's papers in the courtroom no less while everyone was on a break.....

now my question is why these guys are still in the law game..both Hill and Genis...Judge Hill is incompetent to say the least and Atty Genis is fat setting loose cannons like Tony Denunzio and Peter Lance free when they should be in a little jail in Alabama for perverting justice

speaking of perverts, remember Darryl is pals with porn film maker Andrew Luster..he made the "The Max Fuctor" starring Darryl and Mireille Miller-Young
I don't know.. but this much I do know, Darryl can do whatever he wants in Judge Brian Hill's courtroom..anything...there's no consequences...Hill's the daddy and Genis is the spoiled kid and Hill has no control over his court cases...he's useless, he's pointless and I'm flabberghasted he's a judge...

but I heard through the grapevine that Mireille Miller-Young, the UCSB porn professor that smacked that little teenie religious cult gal for trying to kill her baby, well I heard thet she is pregnant with Darryl's baby and they BOTH have to attend anger-management classes together!

I guess that's all I could hope for

　

Fugitives from Justice
in other courtroom news, Randy and Evie Quaid are considered "fugitves from justice" according to a tentative ruling...

Case: Randy Quaid, et al. v. American Surety Company,

Case No. #1467545, Judge Sterne

Hearing Date: July 28, 2014

Matter: Motion to Quash Subpoena for Production of Business Records in Action Pending Outside of California

the judge ruled that the Subpoena could be squashed...apparently the Quaids said they didn't break a mirror and had photo proof, but being fuitives from justice, they can't obtain records in California...

　
The records sought are "Color Photographs in evidence for Case No. 1363847."

Motion: The Sheriff moves to quash the subpoena on two grounds: 1) The Quaids are fugitives from justice and, under the disentitlement doctrine, they cannot seek civil redress. 2) The exclusive means for obtaining evidence in a criminal case is pursuant to Penal Code § 1054.5

Response to Motion: The motion to quash is treated as a "petition" under CCP § 2029.600. Counsel for Quaids acknowledges that he is not licensed to practice law in California. The fugitive disentitlement doctrine does not apply to civil proceedings. The documents are necessary in their civil case against American Surety. They contend that American Surety was unreasonable and negligent in posting $1,000,000 in bail bonds without authorization. They contend the photograph of a mirror will show it was not damaged.

Tentative Ruling: The court grants the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department’s Motion to Quash Subpoena for Production of Business Records in Action Pending Outside of California.

But all I got is a photograph. And I realise you're not coming back anymore...